Skip to main content

Autonomous Cars

The Problem with Self-Driving Cars


Every year, so many people die in car accidents, most of them caused because of the driver's negligence. Exorbitant amounts of money are spent just to fund awareness campaigns and stop people from “drinking and driving”.

All of this after the fact that the technology for self-driving cars is in the last stages of development. Why are self-driving cars not the next big thing yet? Companies like Tesla, Uber and heck, even Google are racing to be the next innovator of autonomous cars.
“This is stupid… Obviously, the cars are expensive.”
See that’s the point, these cars are not ridiculously expensive (at least not for people who own an iPhone X).

“Well then we obviously don’t have the requisite technology”
That is partially true but trust me, the cars are way closer technology-wise than you may think.

The biggest problem with autonomous cars is (insert drumroll) “A Moral Dilemma”.
Disappointed? Just hear me out. Imagine there is a self-driving car minding its own business rolling down the road when suddenly an idiot jumps in front of the car! What should the car be programmed to do if the only alternatives are killing the driver or killing off the idiot?
Consider another case. This time the autonomous car takes a sharp turn to avoid one accident only to find itself in front of an old lady, about to ram into her and kill her? What should the car be programmed to do? Kill the lady or the driver?
This is the last one I promise. What if in the very first case, instead of one person jumping in front of the car, 10 people do. Should the car be programmed to kill the 10 people or the singular passenger of the car?

I lied, this is the last one (#getrektm8). This time the situation is such that it’s nobody’s fault but either the car can ram into 5 people and kill them, ram into an animal van and kill 100 endangered birds and make the species extinct, or kill the driver?
So now I would expect your answers to be:
    I.            Kill the idiot
II.            (Let us leave this one for now)
III.            (Again, highly controversial, will discuss later)
IV.            Kill the driver
If your answers of the 1st and 4th situations are the same, good job! You have a decent human conscience. Congratulate your parents as they did a fine job raising you.
If they don’t match, there is something seriously wrong with you. Why are you even reading this? The concept of moral dilemmas probably goes right over your head. As far as I am concerned you might be one of those shady government agents (cough Jason Bourne cough) whose conscience was destroyed… 


Moving on, so far it might seem obvious as to how cars should be programmed. But what happens when you are the passenger of the car? Would you sacrifice yourself to save 3 or even 5 people when it wasn’t your fault? Go ahead be chivalrous and say yes, but secretly even you know that you would rather kill the 3 people.
By chance, if you really are some god (Albert Einstein for the atheists) reincarnated, and you choose to sacrifice yourself, remember, not all people may think like you. And since this is self-driving cars we are talking about, all of them must be programmed to make the same decision, even if the owner does not wish to do so, or would do something else if he was driving. Therein lies the dilemma… Why would you want to buy a car that might sacrifice you just to save 5 suicidal idiots (the car won’t have the capacity to determine that it was their fault)?

The 2nd and 3rd cases above just reinforce my point… How do you determine the value of anyone’s life?

Not to mention the car might not be able to see a way of saving both the passenger and the pedestrian because it is not a human. Even if start collecting data from previous accidents (become Google part II, “Yes Google, I know that you have been stealing my data…”) chances are the car won’t be able to determine whose fault it was and hence who deserves to die for their mistake…

I realize that this may come across as heartless but that is the sad truth. For this very reason, most people are not willing to buy an autonomous car, as they don’t want to die in an accident when they could have been saved by killing the other person…

This article is written by Anchit Jain of Amity International School, Noida!!!


Enjoy your high school with - High School Pedia : www.highschoolpedia.com

Comments

Popular Posts

Anode Ray Experiment

→Anode ray experiment was conducted by E Goldstein. →These rays are also known as canal rays. →This experiment helped in the discovery of the proton. Apparatus Used A discharge tube  was taken in which there were 2 electrodes i.e. Anode(+ve) and the cathode (-ve). The tube was filled with an inert gas. A perforated or porous cathode was used. A layer of zinc sulphide was placed at the back of the cathode. There was a vacuum pump in the tube. High voltage (5000v-10000v) was allowed to flow through the system. It was observed that when the gas was at 1atm(atmospheric pressure ) no change was seen in the tube.  When the   pressure   was decreased inside the tube, a glow could be seen at the back side of the cathode.

Android Versions Named After Sweet

Have you ever thought why are Android versions always named after sweet names ?? Everytime a new Android version is launched its name is kept after a sweet name. Many people have researched about this topic and many have asked Google also. Have you ever tried to find out the core reason behind this? If not then you would find the answer here . First of all let us first see what Google says about this : In 2008 i.e. the year when Android was launched a reporter asked the reason for the same. At that time Google said “It’s kind of like an internal team thing, and we prefer to be a little bit — how should I say — a bit inscrutable in the matter, I’ll say,” said Randall Sarafa, a Google spokesman. “The obvious thing is that, yeah, the Android platform releases, they go by dessert names and by alphabetical order for the most part."

Rutherford Alpha Ray Scattering Experiment

Rutherford Alpha Ray Scattering Experiment Hey, Guys, most of you might have heard about the alpha ray scattering experiment and if you want to know in detail about Rutherford's model and the experiment he conducted, this is the right place for you... But first: Things You Must Know Some basic information that will help you understand rutherford experiment properly: Proton is a sub-atomic particle which is positively charged and has a mass of 1u. Alpha particles are helium atom with a charge of +2 as they have lost 2 electrons. Alpha particles have an atomic mass  of 4u. Gold is highly malleable and can be beaten into very thin sheets. Experiment Rutherford conducted his experiment in the following way: Rutherford took a very thin gold foil and bombarded it with high energy alpha particles. He placed a layer of zinc sulphide on the walls where the experiment was taking place because when alpha particles strike zinc sulphide layer, it results i

Blood Groups

Blood Groups Hey guys, you must have heard people saying "yeah I have AB+ blood group" or " I have the rarest blood group O-" and any sort of these dialogues. But do you actually know what the true meaning of the term Blood Group is. What is Blood Group?? Blood Group is nothing but the type of antibodies and antigens present or absent in your RBC ( Red Blood Cells ). Antigens are located on the surface of your RBC and antibodies in the plasma. It is this combination of antigens and antibodies which decide which blood group you belong to. You inherit these combinations from your parents. But this does not mean that you will have exactly same blood group as your parents. Discovery of Blood Groups Earlier the transfusion of blood from one person to the other would lead to deaths due to incorrect transfer.It was not until 1901, when the Austrian, Karl Land Steiner discovered human blood groups that blood transfusion became safer. Mixing blood from two in

Cathode Ray Experiment

This experiment was conducted by J.J. Thomson (Sir Joseph John Thomson) in the year 1897. This experiment proved that atom is made up of fundamental particles which are much smaller than the smallest atom 'hydrogen' This experiment helped to discover electron. According to J.J. Thomson, the cathode rays consisted of very light, small and negatively charged particles. He named the particles "corpuscles" which were later known as electrons

High School Pedia

It is an initiative by some students to spread the light of knowledge to everyone and everywhere. It was started in the year 2015 and has grown rapidly in the past few months. By the means of this website, we try to provide information on every topic that we can reach up to. You can find different articles on this website. All these articles are written in simple language so that everyone can understand it and learn from it. We at High School Pedia believe in creative learning and this is the reason why we add our own edited graphical representations in every article. Once a very learned man said, “Knowledge increases by not keeping it to yourself but by sharing it with others”. And we follow the same motto “Share to Learn”. The team of High School Pedia tries its best to provide you with the best and original content. Unlike many other websites, High School Pedia is famous for its original and inspiring content.

Isotopes, Isobars and Isotones

Isotopes These are elements which have the same atomic number but different atomic mass . They have the same atomic number because the number of protons that are inside their nuclei remains the same. But, they have different atomic mass because the number of neutrons that are also inside their nuclei is different. As the number of protons inside nuclei remains same, therefore the overall charge of the elements also remains same as in isotopes: no of protons = no of electrons . Hence, as isotopes overall charge remains neutral, therefore their chemical properties will also remain identical.   Therefore, Isotopes are chemically same but physically different.